A sales rep sacked because he was offered another job by a rival firm has been awarded £65,754 compensation after winning his unfair dismissal claim.
Forty-seven-year-old David Love, of Belgrave Street, Bellshill an "extremely successful" sales rep with Fastway Couriers had been approached by rival firm, Central Couriers, in March last year and offered a position, a Glasgow tribunal has heard.
He said he would consider the offer and mentioned it to some colleagues at work next day.
Later that day he received a call from boss James Welsh who later asked him if he had been offered a position with this other organisation.
Mr Love told him he had received an offer of a job and had not had time to think about it.
Mr Welsh told him if he was even considering leaving this questioned his loyalty to them and he was dismissed and asked to leave the premises immediately.
Mr Love then took up the job offer with Central Couriers in April last year. But his employment was terminated after six weeks when the firm got into trading difficulties. He received no pay for that period.
He has since found another job in which he earns £1500 a month. He previously earned over £3000 a month with Fastway Couriers.
Mr Love told the tribunal he was shocked at his dismissal.
Employment judge Walter Muir said his dismissal was automatically unfair as no procedure was followed.
Mr Muir added: "Mr Welsh had plainly made his mind up to dismiss the claimant on hearing news that he had been approached by another organisation.
"In business it is normal and to be expected that approaches will be made to employees who have a good track record. There was simply no question of the claimant's loyalty being an issue at all at the dismissal stage."
The Glasgow tribunal awarded Mr Love, of Petersburn Place, Airdrie, £65,754 compensation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article