JOHN Paul Crook loved driving. Drunk or disqualified, it made no difference to him.
He was not bothered by the length of jail sentences, or the prisons in which he had to serve them.
The 26-year-old was caught in a cycle of repeat-offending until last year when he was offered a place at the Airborne Initiative.
Mr Crook, from Broxburn, who graduated from the scheme last summer and now works for a haulage company and is about to set up his own business, said yesterday that the centre saved him.
He said: ''Airborne made me look to the future and put the past behind me. It put me on the straight and narrow.
''The staff really helped me to work things through and their support gave me motivation to change. They helped me to see the consequences of my actions.''
The Airborne Initiative, which can cater for up to 25 male offenders, combines a strict routine of physical activities like hill walking, cycling, canoeing and abseiling with classes in communication, drug awareness and counselling.
However, critics claim it is the easy option compared to prison.
Mr Crook disagrees. He said: ''People say that it is the soft touch but I'll tell you, it's not. It's a lot of hard work. Prison didn't help me at all because I'd been there so many times. It just makes you worse because you think that's all you're good for
and you're just left in your
cell all day.
''It is so boring which makes you feel even more tense and aggravated.''
Mr Crook was also critical of Chancers, the BBC documentary, saying it did
not resemble the centre he attended.
He said: ''I know a few guys who were on the same course as the one in the programme and they told me the boys just acted up for the cameras.
''It made the staff look like they're never there for the guys, which is the opposite of the truth.
''I was gutted and shocked when they told me it was closing.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article