Grozny, Tuesday
CHECHEN rebels battled Russian troops in the centre of Grozny for a
third day on streets lined with gutted buildings, burnt-out tanks, and
dozens of corpses.
Russian Government statements said the Kremlin's troops had gained
ground three days after a tank-led Russian advance into the city to oust
separatist President Dzhokhar Dudayev.
However news videotape coverage showed Chechen fighters moving
unimpeded through city-centre districts.
Some opened fire on Russian troops from behind trees or kiosks. Others
advanced warily along streets with downed trolley-bus lines and
buildings blackened and pulverised by three weeks of Russian air raids.
In Moscow, Yegor Gaidar, who led Russia's reform programme after the
fall of communism and was once President Boris Yeltsin's close ally,
warned that the conflict threatened Russia with authoritarian rule. The
former Prime Minister voiced the rising anger of many Russians over what
is being widely condemned as a badly thought-out Russian operation.
Blaming hardline Yeltsin aides for the ''military catastrophe'',
Gaidar said the Russian Government could be replaced by or transformed
into an authoritarian regime.
''Events there bear witness once again to the adventurist nature of
the chosen course of a military solution to the problem and at the same
time sharply exacerbate the threat of an authoritarian regime being
formed in Russia,'' he told a news conference.
Gaidar said he was trying to convene an urgent meeting of Parliament
to discuss Chechnya and would propose hearings ''to expose all those who
were responsible for the military operations carried out there''.
Television showed smoke rising from near Dudayev's presidential palace
today but his whereabouts were unknown.
In a television appearance yesterday, he called for fresh talks to end
the Russian push on Grozny and suggested that Russian soldiers held
prisoner could otherwise be killed.
In a letter offering talks to Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin,
Dudayev said the final push into Grozny had been a ''catastrophe for the
attackers and a tragedy for the defenders''.
Interfax news agency said its correspondent in Grozny had reported
that rebels were still keeping Russian troops well away from the palace.
It said the main fighting was near the railway station, a mile west of
the palace.
''Alongside the presidential palace and on its approaches to the north
and north-west are dozens of destroyed Russian armoured vehicles,''
Interfax reported. ''All around lie the bodies of servicemen. Our
correspondent counted about 100 dead Russian servicemen on the streets
around the palace.''
Russian Government statements yesterday said Russian forces had
''regrouped'' after losing several dozen tanks as the advance ran into
stiff resistance. Later, however, they said Russian troops had gained
new ground and secured control of main strategic positions.
Yeltsin sent thousands of troops into Chechnya on December 11, saying
Dudayev's government was harbouring criminals and vowing to crush his
three-year drive to secure independence from Moscow.
However the action has tended to galvanise the resistance of Chechens,
many of whom were previously unsympathetic to Dudayev.
In Moscow, Russian MPs back from a three-week stay in Grozny urged
Yeltsin to halt the advance and resume talks with Chechen leaders.
''Our soldiers of 18 and 19 are lying in the streets in their
hundreds, uncollected three days after being killed,'' said MP Viktor
Korochkin.
Russia faces the choice of unleashing all-out force on Grozny or
withdrawing in humiliation. Western commentators said both options
spelled political disaster for Yeltsin and could lead Moscow into a new
era of authoritarian rule.
''The army is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea -- to
raze the city would be just as politically unacceptable as withdrawal,''
said one Western military expert -- Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article