CABIN crews on British Airways shuttle services will decide today
whether to ballot on industrial action which could begin to hit services
before the end of the new year holiday.
The action would disrupt the airline's short-haul flights, including
the shuttles between London and Glasgow and Edinburgh, as cabin crew
react to what they see as moves to set up a ''cut-price'' crewing
operation working out of Glasgow.
The existing 180 Glasgow-based cabin crew are angry that they are not
being offered work on the Glasgow to New York and Boston route when
Boeing 757s are to be introduced from early next month. They are all
fully trained on 757s, which are the mainstay of the shuttle fleet.
BA considers the existing crews to be uneconomic for the transatlantic
route and has been recruiting 34 ''experienced cabin crew'' for the new
unit at pay and conditions that, it is claimed, seriously undercut
present salaries.
It is said to be offering the recruits basic salaries of about #6000,
well short of the present #10,000 to #11,000 and nowhere near the
#16,000 to #18,000 average earnings.
Not only do existing crew feel their jobs are being undermined, they
also maintain that by ''virtually recruiting people off the streets and
turning them into operational crew within days, BA is making a mockery
of the extensive training and experience of existing crew''.
They have been told that their jobs are not threatened in any way.
However, they fear the new base could be the thin end of the wedge that
could result in a rerun of BA's acquisition of British Caledonian which
saw BCal crews sacked then hired again at much reduced pay and
conditions.
''They must think we came up the Clyde on a banana skin if they expect
us to accept such assurances, given their track record,'' said a
spokesperson for Glasgow branch of the BA Stewards' and Stewardesses'
Association section of the Transport and General Workers Union, which
meets today to consider the issue.
Full-time TGWU officials are to attend, and if feelings are running as
high as suggested then an immediate industrial action ballot could be
called. However, even if a ballot mandate is given, the union still
would need to give BA seven days' notice of any industrial action to
remain within the law -- and the new Glasgow base is due to be up and
running by January 4.
Newspaper and radio recruiting advertisements appeared last week,
followed by interviews over the weekend. A ''foreshorted and tailor-made
Glasgow training programme to full Civil Aviation Authority approval''
will follow over the Christmas and new year periods.
BA had planned for the new Glasgow base to come on stream next summer,
with Manchester and Birmingham-based crews used in the interim, but,
following the failure of negotiations with BASSA, the Scottish option
was brought forward.
It maintains it is important for passengers to hear Scottish voices on
the transatlantic flights out of Glasgow and that it is much more
cost-effective in the long run to have crew based in Scotland rather
than night-stopping crews from Manchester or Birmingham.
The proposed new base will be operated by BA Regional and while
management concedes there are mainline 757 crews based in Glasgow it
complains that ''their unit costs are higher than a BA Regional base
will be''.
The Glasgow BASSA branch yesterday sent out urgent messages to their
colleagues south of the Border outlining the issues and stating: ''Us
now . . . you will be next. Please help your Glasgow colleagues''.
Last night, when asked to comment on the situation, a BA Regional
spokeswoman said that it had always recruited separately and had always
paid less than their mainline counterparts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article