EUROPE was back haunting the Tories yesterday, creating tensions
reminiscent of the Thatcher years, as Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd
sought to build bridges between Britain and its European partners.
He said he did not think there was any advantage to Britain in
delaying the signing of a treaty embodying closer political and economic
union, due to take place at a summit in Maastricht in December, although
the Government would not reach an agreement at any price.
He did not rule out the possibility of a recall summit early next year
after further negotiations to find a form of words with which Britain
could agree, but he said: ''This is not our aim and it is not desirable.
It would be much better to deal with this in an orderly way during the
Dutch presidency this year and then get on with the next steps in the
Community next year.''
However, as the Foreign Secretary tried to take a positive and
constructive line on future relations with the rest of the EC, the depth
of concern on the Tory benches was amply demonstrated by former Cabinet
Minister Norman Tebbit.
Echoing the fears of a significant and vocal number of Tory MPs, he
urged the Prime Minister to oppose at this stage the moves towards a
single currency for the EC. He warned that otherwise the Chancellor
would end up looking like the ''treasurer of a rate-capped local
authority'' and would arrive at the Commons with a budget stamped ''made
in Brussels''.
Mr Tebbit, interviewed on BBC television's On The Record, said: ''If
we cannot win the argument that a single currency would be politically
unacceptable, not just in Britain but I think in France and Germany and
other countries too, after a while we should say we cannot go along with
it.''
Mr Tebbit made clear that he would like a ''No'' from the Prime
Minister at Maastricht: he is concerned over the extent to which Britain
could lose control of the running of its own affairs.
The European issue has once again raised its head at a difficult time
for the Government. It is already under heavy fire over the National
Health Service and an opinion poll yesterday gave Labour a six-point
lead over the Conservatives.
Mr Major is said to be shocked and disappointed by the way in which
Britain appears to have been targeted in recent weeks by senior EC
figures such as Commission President Jacques Delors and Environment
Commissioner Carlos Ripa Di Meana.
Apart from his meeting with Chancellor Helmut Kohl of Germany on
Friday, Mr Major is also planning bilaterals over the next few weeks
with Presidents Andreotti of Italy and Mitterrand of France in an
attempt to find common ground.
In addition, it is virtually certain that the Commons will hold a
major set-piece debate on Europe within the next few weeks in which the
Prime Minister will seek a mandate for his stance on political and
monetary union.
Mr Hurd said agreement on the final shape of Europe would not be
reached at Maastricht: that would ''probably be for our children''.
He said: ''What we have to try and decide at Maastricht is whether
there is enough common ground for a further worthwhile step forward. I
think there is and it is in the interests of Britain that there should
be an agreement at Maastricht. That is what we will be aiming at even
though we are not going to agree, obviously, on the final, the ultimate
shape.''
There were ''federalist ideas'' which Mr Major would not be able to
recommend to the House or the Cabinet, but the Government was working
for an agreement which would involve give and take by everybody.
Labour, meanwhile, accused Ministers of manoeuvring to prevent a split
in the Tory ranks. Shadow Foreign Secretary Gerald Kaufman said: ''Yet
again the Government is preparing for a European summit by planning a
row, a confrontation, and British isolation.
''Yet again Britain's future in Europe is being governed not according
to the nation's interests but in an effort to keep the warring Tory
Party from splitting again.''
Liberal Democrats leader Paddy Ashdown said: ''At the beginning of a
crucial week the Tories are at sixes and sevens over Europe. The
Government is uncertain over economic union and suspicious of political
union. Britain now risks isolation at Maastricht and a permanent place
in the second division of Europe.''
Labour lead5
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article