The Bilsthorpe cave-in is a grim reminder of the dangers miners face,
but, as James McKillop explains, pit safety has improved greatly
THEY work in a hostile environment, but over the years Britain's
miners have become masters of it.
It is always a question of touching wood when talking about accidents
at the pitface, but certainly over the past 10 years the safety record
in British nationalised collieries is second to none.
During the financial year to April, one British Coal employee and two
contractors died. Accidents generally were reduced by 17% while at the
same time productivity increased by 20%.
The reduced accident rate is not a result of the drastic rundown in
the industry, as incidents are based on manhours' work.
It is truly a remarkable safety record that can compete with industry
on the surface, and contrasts sharply with the risk level for those
working on such projects as the Channel Tunnel.
''Yes, we are very conscious of safety in the pits, and last year's
statistics are encouraging,'' a British Coal official said. ''However,
they can be improved upon.''
For many in Scotland familiar with tales of mining disasters of the
past which cost hundreds of lives, the modern record must seem
remarkable.
However, potential disasters can never be discounted. Ten years ago, a
huge explosion ripped through Cardowan colliery, Stepps. Seven men were
left dangerously ill and another 39 injured, but it could have been much
worse. The price paid for cutting coal could have been enormous that
day.
That incident was the exception that has proved the rule in recent
years.
Many of the accidents recorded at collieries today are those that can
occur on any building site -- someone tripping over a carelessly
discarded piece of equipment or clothing being caught in moving
machinery. They are probably more likely than not to happen elsewhere
than at the face.
For example, two miners were killed and others were injured a few
years ago when a mini-train was derailed 1600ft below the North Sea at a
Yorkshire colliery. Falls do occur, but they are rare.
Abroad disasters are still not uncommon. It was reported that during
1990 more than 10,000 Chinese died in mining disasters; in June, 52 were
killed in the Ukraine; last year, 148 miners were buried at a pit on
Turkey's Black Sea coast and 26 died in Nova Scotia; and in 1990 134 men
were killed in an explosion at the Kreka pit at Dobrnja in the then
Yugoslavia. South Africa also has had a series of disasters.
The safety awareness instilled in every miner in this country may have
much to do with drastic cut in the UK accident rate in recent years.
As far back as 1982, the National Union of Mineworkers conference was
told: ''The risk of fatal accidents in mining is now little greater than
the risk everyone runs every day on the roads and in the home.''
While Arthur Scargill's NUM may not be prepared to talk about very
much to British Coal, the one area in which his officials are intimately
involved is that of safety. It is also to do with new technology and the
fact that miners no longer work in the tiny seams of former days.
However, the union will not be slow to point out that the safety
situation in a privatised industry could be a very different story
altogether. For example, a miner killed by a rockfall in south Wales
earlier this year became the third fatality in a year at a private mine
in the Principality.
The death in March of Mr Willam Gorman, 35, from New Cumnock,
Ayrshire, in a roof fall at Monktonhall Colliery occurred just after he
had collected his first pay packet after seven years out of work.
It was a setback for the privately run consortium, set up by 166
miners each investing #10,000 in the venture. Mr Gorman, who had
previously worked at Killoch Colliery from leaving school until it
closed in 1986, had come up with his share through the support of his
family and a bank loan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article