Academics, artists, authors and stage and screen celebrities are among the 4000 people who signed a petition opposing plans to build a bar and nightclub in Glasgow's Botanic Gardens.
The petition, handed in to senior councillors and officials yesterday by residents living near the gardens, also includes support from India, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Canada, France and Switzerland.
Among those supporting the campaign are artist Alasdair Gray, author of the novel Lanark, and his fellow professor of creative writing, poet Tom Leonard. The rump of Glasgow University's bio-sciences departments have also signed, along with botanists from across Britain.
Other signatories include Belle and Sebastian frontman Stuart Murdoch, stand-up comic Phil Kay, the stars of Still Game - Paul Riley, Greg Hemphill and Ford Kiernan - and members of the cast of BBC Scotland soap opera River City, including Gilly Gilchrist.
In addition to the petition, letters opposing the plan from scientists and the directors of other botanical gardens across the UK were also submitted.
Although campaigners have been keen to play down the luminaries backing their call for the case against the scheme to be heard, they claim it illustrates the disquiet against the proposed bar and nightclub.
The delivery of the petition - to Councillor Ruth Simpson, political head of land and environmental services, by Professor Keith Vickerman, chairman of the Friends of the Botanic Gardens, and Jean Charsley, of Hillhead Community Council - follows the revelation on Monday of deepening rifts in Glasgow's ruling Labour administration over the plans.
One constituency branch has voted against the scheme, while at least one Labour councillor, Hanzala Malik, who sat on the committee that approved the project, has now publicly stated his opposition.
Opposition councillors also called into question the transparency of the processes that led to the leisure chain G1 Group being awarded the right to build and operate the bar and club at the entrance of the gardens.
LibDem and SNP members pointed to the council's call for a full public consultation when a publicly owned visitor centre was planned for the site, a process yet to take place since a more controversial, privately owned scheme has been on the table.
But, despite being passed by committee in November 2005, the visitor centre scheme was never referred to publicly again, lack of money cited for its disappearance, and by the following September G1 had applied to run a bar and nightclub.
The council has insisted the public will have a say at the planning stage and claims a consultation on the general principle of more facilities in parks provides the justification for the bar and nightclub within the gardens.
Ms Simpson said: "We accepted the petition and have made clear that should a planning application come forward a full public statutory consultation process will be carried out by the council's development and regeneration services."
Last night Mrs Charsley said: "The delegation was sympathetically heard by Ms Simpson who assured us the petition, the letters from scientists and directors of other Botanic Gardens, would be given to the Lord Provost and council leader Steven Purcell, and that they would also be made aware of all the points made by the delegation."
The G1 Group was unavailable for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article