John Drummond defends the European Arts Festival against allegations
that it is intrinsically political.
IF JOHN DRUMMOND, former controller of BBC Radio 3 and former director
of the Edinburgh International Festival, feels he accepted a poisoned
chalice when he agreed to run the European Arts Festival, he is not
letting on.
The festival -- the Prime Minister's personal response to the British
presidency of the EC -- has been running since the beginning of July,
coincident with the UK succeeding Portugal in the hot seat.
Ironically enough it was during the Maastricht summit itself that John
Major's #6m gift to the cultural life of the country was announced. At
that time the protocol that became the treaty was merely controversial.
After the Danish referendum and in the face of an unpredictable result
from France, it has assumed seismic significance. Far from being a
celebration of Britain's Euro-presidency, the European Arts Festival has
become a political idea in itself.
There are, of course, those who would suggest it was always just that.
John Drummond was accused of accepting ''tainted money'' when he agreed
to direct the spending of the EAF cash. That viewpoint dictates that it
would have been better to have #6m denied to the arts than to have it
spent in any way that might reflect glory on a Government which presides
over a chronic underfunding of the arts.
Drummond contends that it is his hope that the intelligent use of the
money will demonstrate to the Government that there is a need for such
an increased level of funding all the time. And if that sounds naive, he
points to the independence with which he has pursued his task.
His preconditions to accepting the job were that he would not have to
seek matching funding from local authorities or private-sector sponsors,
and that the money would come directly to him through the Office of Arts
and Libraries (i.e., not via the Arts Council) to spend responsibly.
He adds that he has completely reversed the original remit from former
Arts Minister Timothy Renton, who described the proposed EAF as ''a
celebration of British arts in a European context''. What Drummond and
his team have aimed to put together is a celebration of European art in
a British context, perhaps an altogether more realistic aim.
He seems pleased with what has been achieved. With only four months to
put together the programme, there were 650 projects in place at the
beginning of July. There are now more than 1000 and the EAF lion and
stars logo has become familiar at the foot of concert and theatre
programmes.
So why was Drummond in Edinburgh this week, anxious to speak to the
Festival-covering press about his festival, despite the fact that an
ex-Edinburgh Festival director was probably the last thing the current
incumbent Brian McMaster needed around town?
Could it be that there is growing dissatisfaction about the value for
money that is being gleaned from the #6m? Or that the existence of the
Euro-Fest is not well enough known to engender feelings of
Euro-wellbeing among the lieges at a time when the whole future of the
EC is being questioned?
Drummond has yet to be persuaded that his point of view on the
European Arts Festival is intrinsically political. His defence that the
first thing he did was speak to Labour and the Liberal Democrats and
that Neil Kinnock approved of his appointment is hardly relevant.
''There has to be a European cultural dialogue,'' he says. ''The
common currency of Europe is culture not coinage -- but politicians
can't see that.''
Yet the Maastricht Treaty specifically states that a European culture
should be a common aspiration, and Drummond quotes the relevant clause
with approval. Suggest that such a point of view might currently seem
politically controversial in France and his defence is that any European
arts professional would echo his belief.
Be that as it may, it is to Drummond's credit that he declined to
spend Japan Festival-sized sums of money on marketing and that he has
supported the arts infrastructure of the country rather than
concentrating on making a splash.
Next weekend the single most expensive project in the festival, the
EAF tent, makes its sole visit to Scotland, when the symbolically
12-sided structure is pitched in Castle Douglas. The visit by
Catalonia's El Joglars to the Edinburgh Festival would have been
cancelled without EAF support, Theatre de Soleil's Les Atrides in
Bradford was
also EAF-funded, and the EAF breathed life into Scottish
Opera-Go-Round.
Although Scotland has done relatively well in terms of EAF events per
head of population, Glasgow's ''nose may be out of joint'', Drummond
concedes. However, the Scottish Early Music Festival and Neil Wallace's
Tramway (where El Joglars can be seen next week) have cause to be
grateful for his support.
But if John Major really hoped that funding those events and the visit
of a Portuguese jazz group to Lancashire would make good Europeans of us
all, he may yet be disappointed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article