Mr Saint-Yves asks "why does the EU not promote an agreed military nuclear defence policy, instead of a piecemeal approach to this vital issue?" (April 2). The simple answer is that the EU, like the enlarged Nato, is too big to provide collective coherence on security matters.
The apparent national interests of some of the new accession states are quite different, indeed arguably inimical to, the interests of some of the original "core" founder states of the European Union.
Many in eastern Europe see membership of the EU as not only an economic opportunity but, coupled to Nato membership, a military guarantee against a Russia that is only now finding its feet in the post-Soviet area.
The irony is that the only military "security" Nato can offer is to its most recent members on Europe's eastern periphery, not to its original membership.
Yet in providing "security" for these new states, Nato has set in train a shockwave of destabilisation that is a key determinant of Russian foreign policy that can be felt right across Asia Minor as far as Iran (witness the watered-down Security Council hostage statement).
Mr Saint-Yves rightly concludes that Trident II will not ensure Britain's safety and this is a view increasingly shared by figures right across the political spectrum. However, the window of opportunity, if it ever existed, of his aspiration for a distinctly European power bloc, underpinned by nuclear weapons, has long since gone. Bill Ramsay, 84 Albert Avenue, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article